The proceedings were in the context of a franchise in the banking/lending industry. The question was whether or not, on the proper construction of the franchise agreement, RAMS was obliged to provide certain information to the franchisee. If that obligation existed, the question then became what, if any, loss of opportunity arose from the non-provision of that information.
Nicholas Andreatidis (with P Neskovcin QC) appeared on behalf of the defendant, instructed by Allens Linklaters.
The judgment is available here.
